Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models
This page lists all metadata that was entered for this dataset. You can download the dataset.
Feature
Citation
Citation Options
Identification
| Title: | Main Title: Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models |
| Description: | Abstract: This study compares two modeling platforms, ParFlow.WRF (PF.WRF) and the Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP), with a common 3D integrated surface–groundwater model to examine the variability in simulated soil–vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Idealized and hindcast simulations over the North Rhine–Westphalia region in western Germany for clear-sky conditions and strong convective pre- cipitation using both modeling platforms are presented. Idealized simulations highlight the strong variability introduced by the difference in land surface parameterizations (e.g., ground evaporation and canopy tran- spiration) and atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) schemes on the simulated land–atmosphere interactions. Results of the idealized simulations also suggest a different range of sensitivity in the two models of land surface and atmospheric parameterizations to water-table depth fluctuations. For hindcast simulations, both modeling platforms simulate net radiation and cumulative precipitation close to observed station data, while larger differences emerge between spatial patterns of soil moisture and convective rainfall due to the dif- ference in the physical parameterization of the land surface and atmospheric component. This produces a different feedback by the hydrological model in the two platforms in terms of discharge over different catchments in the study area. Finally, an analysis of land surface and ABL heat and moisture budgets using the mixing diagram approach reveals different sensitivities of diurnal atmospheric processes to the groundwater parameterizations in both modeling platforms. |
| Identifier: | 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0159.1 (DOI) |
| Citation Advice: | Sulis, M., Williams, J. L., Shrestha, P., Diederich, M., Simmer, C., Kollet, S. J., & Maxwell, R. M. (2017). Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 18(5), 1489-1511. |
Responsible Party
| Creators: | Mauro Sulis (Author), John L. Williams (Author), Prabhakar Shrestha (Author), Malte Diederich (Author), Clemens Simmer (Author), Stefan Kollet (Author), Reed M. Maxwell (Author) |
| Publisher: | AMS |
| Publication Year: | 2018 |
Topic
| TR32 Topic: | Topography |
| Related Subproject: | Z4 |
| Subject: | Keyword: Modelling |
File Details
| Filename: | Sulis_etal2017.pdf |
| Data Type: | Text - Article |
| File Size: | 3 MB |
| Dates: | Accepted: 14.02.2017 Available: 08.05.2017 |
| Mime Type: | application/pdf |
| Language: | English |
| Status: | Completed |
Constraints
| Download Permission: | Free |
| General Access and Use Conditions: | According to the TR32DB data policy agreement. |
| Access Limitations: | According to the TR32DB data policy agreement. |
| Licence: | [TR32DB] Data policy agreement |
Geographic
Specific Information - Publication
| Publication Status: | Published |
| Review Status: | Peer reviewed |
| Publication Type: | Article |
| Article Type: | Journal |
| Source: | JHM |
| Issue: | 5 |
| Volume: | 18 |
| Number of Pages: | 23 (1489 - 1511) |
Metadata Details
| Metadata Creator: | Prabhakar Shrestha |
| Metadata Created: | 16.01.2018 |
| Metadata Last Updated: | 16.01.2018 |
| Subproject: | Z4 |
| Funding Phase: | 3 |
| Metadata Language: | English |
| Metadata Version: | V50 |
Metadata Export
| Metadata Schema: |
Dataset Statistics
| Page Visits: | 816 |
| Metadata Downloads: | 0 |
| Dataset Downloads: | 2 |
Dataset Activity
Feature
By downloading this dataset you accept the license terms of [TR32DB] Data policy agreement and TR32DB Data Protection Statement
Adequate reference when this dataset will be discussed or used in any publication or presentation is mandatory. In this case please contact the dataset creator.
Adequate reference when this dataset will be discussed or used in any publication or presentation is mandatory. In this case please contact the dataset creator.
