[794] - Sensitivity and uncertainty of analytical footprint models according to a combined natural tracer and ensemble approach

All available metadata of the dataset is listed below. Some features are available, e.g. download of dataset or additional description file.

By downloading files from this dataset you accept the license terms of TR32DB Data policy agreement and TR32DBData Protection Statement.
Adequate reference when this dataset will be discussed or used in any publication or presentation is mandatory. In this case please contact the dataset creator.
Due to the speed of the filesystem and depending on the size of the archive and the file to be extracted, it may take up to thirty (!) minutes until a download is ready! Beware of that when confirming since you may not close the tab because otherwise, you will not get your file!
van de Boer, A., Moene, A. F., Schüttemeyer, D., Graf, A., 2012. Sensitivity and uncertainty of analytical footprint models according to a combined natural tracer and ensemble approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 169, 1 - 11. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.016.
Citation Options
Export as: Select the file format for your download.Citation style: Select the displayed citation style.
Title(s):Main Title: Sensitivity and uncertainty of analytical footprint models according to a combined natural tracer and ensemble approach
Description(s):Abstract: Evaluations of analytical footprint models using data from several stations located in different land use types are still scarce, but valuable for defining the spatial context of the measurements. Therefore, we evaluated two analytical footprint models by applying a ‘forward’ and an ‘inversion’ method. We used eddy covariance measurements from a flat agricultural landscape in western Germany in the summer of 2009, with seven eddy covariance systems over three different land use types with contrasting sensible heat fluxes. We found that the model of Hsieh et al. (2000. Adv. Water Resour. 23, 765–772) and of Kormann and Meixner (2001. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 99, 207–224) are both overestimating the distance of the peak contribution of the footprint. In our evaluation, the former model performs slightly better, independent of whether the crosswind dispersion was used from the latter model, or from the proposed model by Detto et al. (2006. Water Resour. Res. 42, 1–16).
Identifier(s):DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.016
Responsible Party
Creator(s):Author: Anneke van de Boer
Author: Arnold F. Moene
Author: Dirk Schüttemeyer
Author: Alexander Graf
Publisher:Elsevier B.V
TR32 Topic:Atmosphere
Subject(s):CRC/TR32 Keywords: Eddy Covariance, Footprint
File Details
File Name:2012_vandeBoer_AFM.pdf
Data Type:Text
Size(s):11 Pages
File Size:767 kB (0.749 MB)
Date(s):Date Accepted: 2012-09-22
Available: 2012-11-27
Mime Type:application/pdf
Data Format:PDF
Download Permission:OnlyTR32
General Access and Use Conditions:For internal use only
Access Limitations:For internal use only
Licence:TR32DB Data policy agreement
Measurement Region:Ellebach
Measurement Location:Merken
Specific Informations - Publication
Article Type:Journal
Source:Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Number Of Pages:11
Page Range:1 - 11
Metadata Details
Metadata Creator:Dirk Schüttemeyer
Metadata Created:2013-12-10
Metadata Last Updated:2013-12-10
Funding Phase:2
Metadata Language:English
Metadata Version:V40
Dataset Metrics
Page Visits:566
Metadata Downloads:0
Dataset Downloads:3
Dataset Activity